What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Neville Longbottom Your opinion on Neville being used as a waiter in the Half-Blood Prince movie:

92 fans picked:
He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!)
   68%
At least he was in the movie; he wasn't there a lot in the book.
   18%
He should have tended to the plants instead. He's good at that.
   10%
Service is where he belongs. He's not a great wizard, and he likes helping people
   3%
 timbitzk posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

13 comments

user photo
ShadowRocksxxx picked At least he was in the movie; he wasn't there a lot in the book.:
yeah, what happened to the battle scene?
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
timbitzk picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
Apparently the higher-ups thought that a battle at the end of HBP and at the end of Deathly Hallows would be repetitive. What I don't get is that The Battle of Hogwarts will be at the end of the second DH movie! Oh well. Haha
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
BaSbooSa picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
I don't know about any battle scenes 'cause I didn't read the books... but he was so brave in the fifth movie! ;)
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
last edited lebih dari setahun yang lalu
 
user photo
EalasaidWooster picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
It's such a shame! In the movies they always show Neville in a really pathetic light - breaking things, serving people, etc - but they exclude all the scenes where he finally earns himself some glory!!
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
peteandco picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
i really wonder why we saw him as a servant. that's unfair, i would love to see him fighting again.but that's true: he wasn't very present in the book, so i guess we should be glad to see him, even as a waiter
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
Barbie22 picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
Well, at least he will shine in Deathly Hallows Part 2 :)
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
last edited lebih dari setahun yang lalu
 
user photo
demideardarling picked At least he was in the movie; he wasn't there a lot in the book.:
But you've got to admit, he was pretty durn cute as a waiter.
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
gryffindorgal picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
Erm... ^^ idts...
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
hp4eva7 picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
GRRRR!
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
DrJacksonLake picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
o_0
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
Hermione7 picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
Seriously always include a battle scene in the movie. Always include one.
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
MORE LONGBOTTOM!
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.
 
user photo
LowriLorenza89 picked He's not a servant, he's a fighter! (What happened to the battle scene?!):
That scene didn't look like they got Neville's character arc at all (and the one about looking after plants being him is a good point).
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu.