jawab pertanyaan ini

musik Pertanyaan

What is an obvious difference between the musik from ten to twenty years ago, and the musik nowadays?

Lots of people say that the musik from nowadays lacks a certain emotion...

Other people say that Bieber is a fag...

Other people say musik from nowadays is just about money and fame...

These are all motives from people who prefer the early music(I do too, btw.) What do anda say it's so different, not talking about genres?
 Bond_Of_Fury posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »

musik Jawaban

cassie-1-2-3 said:
The fact that artis are lebih glorified now than they were back then plays a huge role. There are gossip shows and famous internet bloggers. Back then there was pretty muck just Vh1, Mtv, and a few magazines. lebih people want to be artis and musik is the easiest path to take. lebih and lebih people with not quite as much talent are being marketed. What they have is synthesized talent. not raw talent.

There ARE still people of today with raw talent, just as there were 30 years yang lalu (despite what all the closed minded people say) No talent preventers were added to the water supply. They're just not as easy to fine. If you're really interested in finding them, look around.

It has a little to do with the themes.. there are a lot lebih songs about having sex and lots of money (not my favorit topics) but it's nothing new.

I don't believe it has anything to do with "new" genres. I'm glad there are other things besides rock out there.

I don't know why so many people are concerned about Bieber... He's just one guy.

Today"s musik isn't so much lacking, as it's lebih "overdone", anda could say.


And again, (this is something I've berkata over and over again) there is nothing wrong with covers. the cover artists is not trying to improve atau replace the original. they just want to sing a song they respect. there's nothing wrong with that. (except maybe those pop to punk things. I really doubt they respect those songs, which makes it rude)


that is all, I think.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Now this is a good answer. I agree with practically everything here, except for the bit with the covers, but it is just an opinion. I hate most covers, doesn't matter how much that artist respects that song. Good originals should be left an original.
Bond_Of_Fury posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
*VOTES BEST ANSWER*
leytonfaan_18 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Originals are still originals, and they're still there, no matter how many times it's covered.
cassie-1-2-3 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
And thank anda guys.
cassie-1-2-3 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
deathroman13 said:
musik from now sucks.. it all goes about money and a lot of songs are stolen. and there are horrible musik genres now.. like Pop and hiphop and rap.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
uhm... Pop, Hip hop and Rap were already there in the 80's... The Outfield, Run DMC, eminem is also from the 90's. But I agree with you, especially most covers are horrid.
Bond_Of_Fury posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »