I'll start oleh quoting Buffy herself, stating that she loved malaikat lebih than she'd ever loved anyone in her life.

I'm also going to explain my preference oleh criticising her other pairings. malaikat gets criticised for making some decisions on her behalf, but I think the others are worse.

Riley

Firstly, I've a problem with her being paired with any normal human. malaikat broke up with her so that she could have a normal human life - but she isn't a normal human. She's a slayer. Realistically, she's not going to survive long enough to grow old with someone. Same with being with someone who can give her children. The only known Slayer who had a child left her son effectively orphaned when he was just 4, and that's if she survives her pregnancy with all the attacks and apocalypses she experiences.

Secondly, Riley was just no good for her. In my interpretation, she had some trust/commitment issues after Angel, which left her unable to risk falling as deeply in cinta again, in the short term at least. She was holding herself back. Riley noticed this but interpreted it wrongly. This led to his jealousy, inferiority complex and stupidly letting vampire whores drink from him.

Spike

Ok, they have cute moments. I'll give anda that. I'd be pairing her with Spike if malaikat didn't exist.

But the initial relationship was clearly unhealthy. She was using him, and he was practically stalking her earlier. After she broke up with him he tried to rape her. I know we really should be forgiving ensouled Spike for his soulless behaviour - as we do with malaikat - but the Spuffy fans' own best argument for their pairing goes against that. They go on and on about him loving her without a soul. That makes it harder to differentiate between the 2 Spikes.