It might just be me, but does anyone else think that the way the buku are portrayed poorly?
Let's start with 'Interview with a Vampire'.
Loius was made off to be sedated in his expressions. Just because the character is being done oleh Brad Pitt doesn't mean that the director couldn't snap him into shape! Pitt's major save was the way he pulled off Louis's awe and confusion.
However, my major problem was 'Queen of the Damned'.
Several of the characters were removed. There was no mention on how vampirism began, no mention of the Twins. How can they do a movie if they refuse to use the plot?
And going onto the characters...
As much as I dislike Tom Cruise, he did a marvelous job displaying Lestat's attitude and sexuality. He was able to pull off the air of charm of smugness that makes us fall in cinta with Lestat in the first place. Townshed down plays the attitude, making Lestat seem lazier and lebih dependant.
Marius was successfully shown as a teacher, but a lot less graceful and the look was off.
Armand, however...both film seem to be trying to destroy him.
'Interview with a Vampire' made him a creeper. True he is the leader of the Children of Darkness at the time, but his appearance of a young man should have been there.
'Queen of the Damned' kept the youth, but caked on so much make-up he had the appearance of a drag queen!
I say these things not to complain but to make others aware.
We push to see these characters on screen, and we want the end product to be enjoyable, not an insult.