jawab pertanyaan ini

acak Pertanyaan

Are anda for animal testing atau against it?

Pros & Cons
Tell me why, and which side are anda on.

Also what I mean oleh testing is like medical, like cures for cancer and ect.


*
Thank anda for your answer, this 'll help my research paper nicely. Oh and I can't say I'm for it but I'm not against it.
x-Yumi-x3 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Meaning I'm for it, but let's not go past animal rights. (common sense. binatang don't have rights)
x-Yumi-x3 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Do people have rights?
ITF posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
 x-Yumi-x3 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »

acak Jawaban

ITF said:
I am against it 100%
Why:
Because I consider humans and binatang equal.
It is not like one atau two mice will cure cancer, it takes hundreds of binatang to make any progress. Even then, it must be retested many times.
There are many pharmaceutical drugs which had been deemed aman, brankas for human use after extensive animal testing, but which were later found to cause serious side effects.
Over 100 million binatang are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in U.S. labs every year.
Not just mice and rats are used. Shelter anjing and cats, rabbits, apes, monkeys, sheep, and many other binatang are killed in labs, sometimes even people's lost pets.
Nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animal studies go on to fail in human clinical trials.
Reliance on animal experimentation can impede and delay discovery.
Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effective non-animal research methods, including human-based microdosing, in vitro technology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modeling, that are cheaper, faster, and lebih accurate than animal tests.
The food and Drug Administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans.
Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures oleh misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research.
The world doesn’t need another eyeliner, hand soap, food ingredient, drug for erectile dysfunction, atau pesticide so badly that it should come at the expense of animals’ lives.
Through taxes, donations, and private funding, Americans have spent almost $200 billion on cancer research since 1971. However, lebih than 500,000 Americans die of cancer every year, a 73 percent increase in the death rate since the “war” began.
The only U.S. law that governs the use of binatang in laboratories—the Animal Welfare Act—allows binatang to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No experiment, no matter how painful atau trivial, is prohibited – and pain-killers are not even required. Even when alternatives to the use of binatang are available, the law does not require that they be used—and often they aren’t. Because the Act specifically excludes rats, mice, birds and cold-blooded animals, lebih than 95 percent of the binatang used in laboratories are not subject to the minimal protections provided oleh federal laws. Because they are not protected oleh the law, experimenters don’t even have to provide mice and rats with pain relief.



If anda are for it atau not sure, then I suggest anda read Animal Liberation oleh Peter Singer and anda can save the Animals. These buku tell anda about really happens.
select as best answer
 I am against it 100% Why: Because I consider humans and binatang equal. It is not like one atau two mice will cure cancer, it takes hundreds of binatang to make any progress. Even then, it must be retested many times. There are many pharmaceutical drugs which had been deemed aman, brankas for human use after extensive animal testing, but which were later found to cause serious side effects. Over 100 million binatang are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in U.S. labs every year. Not just mice and rats are used. Shelter anjing and cats, rabbits, apes, monkeys, sheep, and many other binatang are killed in labs, sometimes even people's lost pets. Nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animal studies go on to fail in human clinical trials. Reliance on animal experimentation can impede and delay discovery. Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effective non-animal research methods, including human-based microdosing, in vitro technology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modeling, that are cheaper, faster, and lebih accurate than animal tests. The food and Drug Administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures oleh misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research. The world doesn’t need another eyeliner, hand soap, food ingredient, drug for erectile dysfunction, atau pesticide so badly that it should come at the expense of animals’ lives. Through taxes, donations, and private funding, Americans have spent almost $200 billion on cancer research since 1971. However, lebih than 500,000 Americans die of cancer every year, a 73 percent increase in the death rate since the “war” began. The only U.S. law that governs the use of binatang in laboratories—the Animal Welfare Act—allows binatang to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No experiment, no matter how painful atau trivial, is prohibited – and pain-killers are not even required. Even when alternatives to the use of binatang are available, the law does not require that they be used—and often they aren’t. Because the Act specifically excludes rats, mice, birds and cold-blooded animals, lebih than 95 percent of the binatang used in laboratories are not subject to the minimal protections provided oleh federal laws. Because they are not protected oleh the law, experimenters don’t even have to provide mice and rats with pain relief. If anda are for it atau not sure, then I suggest anda read Animal Liberation oleh Peter Singer and anda can save the Animals. These buku tell anda about really happens.
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
your very first statement after the "why" kinda lost my vote...
True-Finn-Fan posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
also, it appears that anda used the same information structure as on the AAVS (Animal Anti-Vivisection Society)'s website artikel i read. in fact, it's almost identical, although lebih explained in the article.
True-Finn-Fan posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Answer my pertanyaan first. Would anda kill a child to save your family? But what does this have to do with animal testing? Like I berkata above, one mouse would not cure anyone. Everything must be retested many times and hundreds of binatang die to make any progress. And not just die, they are killed in very painful ways.
ITF posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
KohakuJSMA said:
I am not for that.
It is very mean, and inhumane. >:C
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
sieluvzsoul said:
AGAINST IT!!! ALL THE WAY!!
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Good for you!
ITF posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
egyptprincess7 said:
I'm really on the neutral side. I mean it could help society but it could also seriously harm those poor animals.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
Makeupdiva said:
I guess I am half and half, neutral.

If it can help keep people alive from cerain diseases, cancers, etc. There probably isn't really another way to test those on. I don't really agree with it though because binatang have lives like we do.

I definitely don't agree with testing cosmetics, hair products, halaman awal cleaning products, etc. on animals, it's just so wrong and it should be band. However, they are trying to ban in in the US and Canada, but they do test on binatang in jepang which I just don't agree with.

I'm not good at explaining exactly how I feel on these sort of topics. So, I'm just saying, I am half and half.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
frostedgirl1 said:
178%
Against it!!!
I hate hate hate it!
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
BlondLionEzel said:
Pros:

If it's medicine for an animal, they do need to make sure it works.

Cons:

Do anda really need to use them to test Cosmetics? Really?
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
I agree.
x-Yumi-x3 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
summer2987 said:

I put my face up to the clear glass object, inhaling and exhaling leaving my hands oleh my sides. "No," I whispered,"this can't be," I repeated. I had lost hope, my insides turning inside out. I will not let it end here, I will not allow this to turn to dust. I slowly put my fingers to the knob, slowly opening the door and feeling the burst of air hit my face."I will not let this happen," I have diberikan up all means of life, it was impossible. What had happens happened. I was not the supreme ruler, there was nothing I could not rule over, I looked inside of the object and put my hand through the darkness and felt something hard yet soft. I pulled it out, and muttered one word before I fell into oblivion,"egg."
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
?
ITF posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
AnimeFan66 said:
I'm against animal testing in all matters and forms.

Because I myself am a pure lover of ALL binatang and species worldwide. I have been sense I was a little boy. After membaca artikel and hearing stories about how they were captured, abused, and killed it just drove me to madness. I couldn't beruang the thought of elephants getting poached for ivory atau rhinos for their horns. Even the Great Apes of Africa and Asia are facing threats because of illegal logging and the use of palm oil. :( It's depressing to me.

Whatever ya'll have to say about it is your perspective. But I'm against any form of animal cruelty, testing, etc.
select as best answer
 I'm against animal testing in all matters and forms. Because I myself am a pure lover of ALL binatang and species worldwide. I have been sense I was a little boy. After membaca artikel and hearing stories about how they were captured, abused, and killed it just drove me to madness. I couldn't beruang the thought of elephants getting poached for ivory atau rhinos for their horns. Even the Great Apes of Africa and Asia are facing threats because of illegal logging and the use of palm oil. :( It's depressing to me. Whatever ya'll have to say about it is your perspective. But I'm against any form of animal cruelty, testing, etc.
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
next question »