Sorry about the pictures, Fanpop won't let me upload them, but I don't think you need any reminder of what they look like.

Pocahontas is just so historically inaccurate you can make a drinking game. Take a sip every-time something historically inaccurate happens! oh wait that's the entire movie....warning you may die from this drinking game...

^ Funny, but at least she looks a bit like her movie self.

Rapunzel is a lot paler, with darker thicker hair, extremely off facial features that looks NOTHING like her face in the movie, and her dress is a dark purple when in the movie, her dress is a light purple-pink. She looks younger than Snow White

Her facial structure is off, she has way to much bling, and the accessories are a bit much and non-existent in the original (except for her mothers necklace.) I wouldn't mind her redesign so much if her face looked more like her. I do think Rapunzel's redesign is inaccurate but I think Pocahontas's resign is worse.

but pocahontas isnt supposed to be historically accurate, they never said she was. she still looks similar to herself, rapunzel on the other hand looks ugly and like a frog with totally different coloring!

While I hate all the stuff they piled on Pocahontas (and what happened with her necklace?), Rapunzel's face looks less like her.

She's quite changed. I don't remember that many changes in Rapunzel.

I think Rapunzell is silly and her story is so so boring!!!
That's all

Oh lord, the feathers.... oh lord, the butchered necklace and OH LORD THE BOOTS.

@Snickerz911411 and @PrincessErika: It's about their merchandise forms, not their movies or characters!

Her face and necklace, ugh...

Especially her facial features :P

Rapunel just doesn't look like herself.

She has suffered many changes, many addings. Rapunzel is conceptually similar to her old self.

Nothing like in movie. And her face is a little different.

Both look nothing like their selves.

I agree with jayden-G, both look horrible and inaccurate but Rapunzel looks more different.