Ok, here I go. First, I wanna apologize for my English, because it's quite bad (I'm Russian).
I was really impressed (in a bad way) oleh the komentar most of Spike haters make all over the internet. All of those komentar seem to be very alike: "Spike was bad, while malaikat was good". I could never understand this statement. Let's see:
We have two soulless vampires. Angelus and Spike. They both where bad. Yes. vampire are bad. Sorry, Stephenie Mayer. But even soulless Spike had lebih humanity than soulless Angel: when Angelus became a vampire, he killed all his family, while Spike tried to save his...
I've recently been looking on acak websites for artikel about BTVS, just to read other people's opinions. I've found out it just isn't a great thing for me to do, as I find myself so worked up oleh people dissing Spike's character, stressing him as the major element in the downfall of BTVS.