jawab pertanyaan ini

acak Pertanyaan

Do anda think...

that actors that don't receive much attention, the ones you've never heard of, are lebih talented than their lebih famous counterparts?

I think it's true. For example, if an actor is extremely good looking (this might not be the case every time) so his bad akting is ignored, he won't feel encouraged to better himself.

And the movies, like some of the Saw series, turn out good because they get actors that are talanted, not famous, and look like nomal people.
 MasterOfFear posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »

acak Jawaban

LinaHarrow said:
I agree, I think.
So let me get this straight. Your saying:

That the less populer actors can be lebih populer than the talented ones?
-and-
That if an actor gets a lot of fame for his looks, but none really for his acting, which he wasn't really good at, he won't want to improve?
-and-
That some film do better because they have good actors who look normal instead of famous actors, who may atau may not act well, who look beautiful?

If so, then yes, I agree.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Yeah. Actors who are lebih populer are probably less talanted than the ones who aren't as renowned.
MasterOfFear posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »