jawab pertanyaan ini

michael jackson Pertanyaan

Michael lost in the Grammy's.

Bruno Mars won.

^ He deserved it too tho. :/
*
...
mjhott posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
*SIGH* :(
blank_et posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Let's not forget Michael still holds the record of the most Grammys won in one night oleh a male artist :)
Whisperoflove7 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
crap>:(
moonwalker64 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
 paloma97ppb posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »

michael jackson Jawaban

LostChild said:
To the Michael Jackson Family he won, he wins every day
I have to say, yes, i was very mad and depressed that he didn't win
He deserves lebih than anything, 1 Grammy wouldn't make a difference for all we owe him, for all he did
He'll always be #1 in my heart
select as best answer
 To the Michael Jackson Family he won, he wins every hari I have to say, yes, i was very mad and depressed that he didn't win He deserves lebih than anything, 1 Grammy wouldn't make a difference for all we owe him, for all he did He'll always be #1 in my jantung
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
so true!!!! I totally agree with you!!!! to us he wins every day.. always!!! he's the best in the world.. the best ever!!!!!!♥♥♥
liberiangirl_mj posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
♥♥♥
77actors posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
sandiphardy said:
MJ IS THE POP bintang OF THE WORLD. THE GRAMMY AWARDS ARE VERY SMALL THINGS FOR HIM.
THE BEST AWARD FOR HIM WAS HIS FANS, FAMILIES, AND THE WORLD.
HE HAD WON ALL THE AWARDS BUT HE HAD WON THE BEST AWARDS IS THE jantung OF HIS fan AND FRIENDS.
WE RESPECT MJ FROM THE BOTTOM OF OUR HEART.
HE HAD DONE MANY THINGS FOR CHILDREN .
HE WILL ALWAYS ALIVE IN fanpop TILL THE END OF OUR LIFE.

select as best answer
 MJ IS THE POP bintang OF THE WORLD. THE GRAMMY AWARDS ARE VERY SMALL THINGS FOR HIM. THE BEST AWARD FOR HIM WAS HIS FANS, FAMILIES, AND THE WORLD. HE HAD WON ALL THE AWARDS BUT HE HAD WON THE BEST AWARDS IS THE jantung OF HIS fan AND FRIENDS. WE RESPECT MJ FROM THE BOTTOM OF OUR HEART. HE HAD DONE MANY THINGS FOR CHILDREN . HE WILL ALWAYS ALIVE IN fanpop TILL THE END OF OUR LIFE.
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
Whisperoflove7 said:
Oh well, congrats to Bruno Mars, good for him! I don't really take the Grammys too serious anyway, i just think it's fun to watch.
For those of anda who are disappointed that Michael didn't win, maybe this clip will cheer anda up a little ;)
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Haha! I remember that episode! :D
MJsValentine posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
HAHAHAH THAT WAS SOOO FUNNY!LOL XD LMAO
moonwalker64 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
thrillergirl18 said:
Michael should had won even though he can't no longer preform. He is still puncak, atas of my daftar as the best pop artist there is.
~I cinta anda MJ~
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
yes i totally agrre <3 awww mj ur still the best!!!<3 :'(
niks95 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
:/
paloma97ppb posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Nawh... I mean... I like MJ but...
zanesaaomgfan posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
mjhott said:
Of course they picked him.....people these days only care for musik these days...so Im not suprised, in my jantung though mj wins and thats all that counts:)
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
koolkat-1104 said:
they should of done a tribute for michael and honored him because he deserves it he is the best performer ever and he's the one who got those ppl on the grammys cuz they we're inspired oleh him.there will never be anyone like him
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
yahh i agree !!
niks95 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
RapQueen111 said:
Michael had to have it. Wanna know why? Becauseee Bruno mars didn't sing 52 YEARS of HIS life...


...Fucked Up.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Ikr
paloma97ppb posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
julialovesMJ said:
Michael defiantly should have won.
but think about it; he really deserves pretty much every award they give out these days..
but it wouldn't be fair to the other artists if he won EVERYTHNG!
think about it that way! ;) ♥
select as best answer
 Michael defiantly should have won. but think about it; he really deserves pretty much every award they give out these days.. but it wouldn't be fair to the other artists if he won EVERYTHNG! think about it that way! ;) ♥
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
MJsValentine said:
I don't care. Michael wasn't here to promote his single, so it doesn't matter. (It doesn't matter if he was alive either, because he is the best, regardless if he won that little golden trophy atau not).

Those award shows are farce anyway. They've always been and Michael never took them serious. Good musik is good music. anda don't need proof, therefore anda have the massive crowds.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
thriller4ever said:
Michael, to millions of people around the globe, is an eternal winner....and no one can deny that... if people do, they are insane... so simple! always the no. 1 in the whole of the "creation"....
select as best answer
 Michael, to millions of people around the globe, is an eternal winner....and no one can deny that... if people do, they are insane... so simple! always the no. 1 in the whole of the "creation"....
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
awsomegtax said:
i think michael should of won but i like bruno mars too and bruno mars did deserve it too there both great but mj is always #1
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
royalssy said:
how can i say.. ppl didnt look at his musik now, but we all do we're MICHAEL JACKSON'S fans. he needs all THE L.O.V.E. from us! eventhough michael lost in the grammys i still have an instinct tell me that michael always the winner, he creates all the music, the dance, and the MAGIC. without his legacy there's no other artist you-know-who ( lazy to type the name haha)

select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
PaisleyPark said:
Okay. I am going to offend someone here. So, sorry.

But come on.

He's been gone for over a year. That's like Elvis Presley still being nominated for Grammys when there are modern artists around.

Is Bruno Mars better than Michael? No.

But he's still alive, and still releasing new music.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
michaeljsgirl said:
That's too bad for Michael. No offense to anybody here, but if it were up to me, I would've picked Bruno over Michael.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
next question »