jawab pertanyaan ini

harry potter Pertanyaan

Why was the Weasley's House burned down on the movie ?

Wasn't Bills and Fleur wedding meant to happen ???
*
good pertanyaan
Ash24 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
lol thanks
Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
 Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »

harry potter Jawaban

Aimee147 said:
That was something I didn't understand either as it wasn't in the book.In the movie, the Weasley's house is burnt down oleh a spell casted oleh Bellatrix Lestrange after a battle with Harry. I think this was stupid, along with the fact that they put this in and missed out Dumbledore's funeral.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
I agree Dumbledore was like my fav and they never gave me any respect :(
Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
narniafreak12 said:
It was because in the book, Harry reads about attacks in the Muggle world. In the film, they decided that Harry and the Weasleys would experience it first hand.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Yeah what about the wedding ?
Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
I guess that the characters would have rebuilt it oleh then?
narniafreak12 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
Yeah but the weasley's don't have a lot of money
Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
1 word Magic
loonylovegood7 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
snusnu13 said:
Half Blood Prince is a hard book to turn into a film. David Yates says it's a "talky Potter, not an action Potter" and since he cut out all major fighting scenes (the fights at the end) he needed action so he added the burning down the Weasley's house.

I think it's stupid, and the fact he didn't put Dumbledore's funeral in because it "didn't fit in with the rest of the film" (David Yates quote, not mine) WTF! Of course it did. When someone dies, anda have a funeral.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
He berkata it didn't fit in the film? Did he read the book, atau just go with the flow? lol...
Castiel4ever posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
probably just made it up as he went along. im expecting the selanjutnya films to be about dancing in circles and fluffy bunnies
snusnu13 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
yes, atau they can go completly off the map and do something wild, like actually stick to the book.
Castiel4ever posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
*
yeah sticking to the book would be something rare for Yates
snusnu13 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
Senecane said:
anda know what, I have no idea. I haven't read the sixth book for a long time, but I don't think that actually happened. I just guess that the writers thought that everything needed lebih action/drama/symphaty-whatever. It just seems really acak to me. The wedding's in the last book.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
I was there for my B-Day and it totally ruined Harry Potter for me also they didn't have s proper funeral for Dumbledore :(
Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
anujapatti said:
because harry is living with weasleys and bellatricks lestrange hates harry a lot and only for this reason she burns the weasleys house.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
Yeah I got that point but why did they do it,it ruined the plot ?
Renesmee_XD posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
readbooks said:
Well i the book the attack happensbut the house doesn't burn down. I think theey just added that. I dont know if it happened for sure but im
pretty sure I just finished readig it. They do
have the wedding at their house so dont
know why they would burn it down.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
Castiel4ever said:
anda know, that was confusing for me as well. My brother, who claims to go to Hogwarts every night with his two young sons, and I watched the movie, then reread the book, and it wasn’t anywhere in the book. So I am just confused as to why they did that…

select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
JonnahZKennedy said:
I know this is an old question, and anda priobably found the answer already, but for the sake of those who look it up and don't see the answer: The reason the Weasley house burned down in the movie, but not the book, is because this was J.K. Rowling's original intentions. She decided against it, and allowed them to do it in the movie instead. This is similar to how Breaking Dawn Part 2 ended with the big action scene, we can assume that's how Stephanie Meyer had originally wanted Breaking Dawn to end.
select as best answer
posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu 
*
great anwser
loonylovegood7 posted lebih dari setahun yang lalu
next question »