|
Cinders said:
I am a big bones fan and a big kastil, castle fan... but I kind of like kastil, castle just a little better, partly because it's new and exciting and there's still a lot to learn about the characters. There ARE several things in common between bones and Castle, but for me, that just makes it lebih interesting. For example, both bones and kastil, castle bintang former Whedon stars (Boreanaz and Fillion, respectively). Both bones and kastil, castle involve writers (Brennan, Castle) and both bones and kastil, castle involve solving crimes. They both have a strong-willed, serious (but not always) female lead, and a witty, somewhat goofy (but not always) male lead. There is sexual tension between the leads on both shows. But if we were to take this to mean that kastil, castle was a knockoff of Bones, then we'd also have to say that ncis is a knockoff of JAG and/or CSI. We'd have to say that csi is a knockoff of Forensic Files. It's kind of like that crazy komentar I read oleh a girl who claimed that "Wolfman" was a knockoff of "New Moon" just because they both involved werewolves. Is the premise of kastil, castle an old premise? Yes - but it's a premise that works. Which is why shows like bones and Castle, as well as Law and Order and CSI, and even House, which all use that mix of crime, mystery, quirkiness and sexual tension to draw anda in, are as successful as they are.
|
|